Keep in mind when Angelina Jolie had a golden alternative to strut her stuff alongside Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore in Charlie’s Angels? Yep, again in 2000, she was all set to affix the action-packed lady gang however stated, “Thanks, however no thanks!” Why would a rising star with an Oscar on the horizon flip down such a juicy position? Let’s dive into this wild experience of a choice.
On the time, Jolie was on fireplace! With hits like The Bone Collector and Woman, Interrupted, she was on her path to literal stardom. Columbia Photos thought Charlie’s Angels could be the icing for her profession. They rolled out the purple carpet, pitching it arduous. “When [Columbia Pictures] despatched me the script for Charlie’s Angels, they stated there hadn’t been excellent, sturdy roles for ladies, that it could make me a giant star, and that I’d have a enjoyable time doing it,” Jolie revealed in a chat with Premiere.
However right here’s the kicker: Jolie wasn’t biting. “All my roles in Gia, Taking part in By Coronary heart, and The Bone Collector have been sturdy feminine. The concept of being a giant STAR has completely NO APPEAL to me,” she shot again. Ouch! Speak about a actuality verify for Hollywood. Jolie felt misplaced with the Charlie’s Angels vibe, noting audiences wouldn’t take pleasure in her chasing dangerous guys in heels.
After the emotional rollercoaster of Woman Interrupted, she was craving one thing a bit lighter. “It was a weighty factor,” she confessed. “It weighed on me.” As a substitute, she had her sights set on Gone in 60 Seconds. “That was going to be my enjoyable film, and I used to be going to have enjoyable doing it with guys,” she stated, prepared for a dose of adrenaline and a aspect of mischief.
Whereas Charlie’s Angels promised motion and laughs, Jolie was drawn to the grit of her character in Gone in 60 Seconds. She described it as grounding. “I did this movie to floor myself as a result of [this character] may be very, y’know, her arms are greasy. She’s acquired two jobs. She is aware of what she desires; easy issues make her blissful.” Now that’s a gal we are able to all relate to!
And should you suppose Jolie didn’t know concerning the publicity that got here with Charlie’s Angels, suppose once more. In a 1999 interview with Movie Ink, she stated, “Plus, I don’t wanna be that uncovered by being in an enormous film.” That’s an influence transfer—she wished to maintain her mystique intact.
In the long run, Jolie’s gamble paid off large time. She soared to new heights with out Charlie’s Angels, and the movie didn’t miss a beat, raking in a jaw-dropping $259.7 million on the field workplace. However wait—Gone in 60 Seconds wasn’t far behind, hauling in a stable $232.6 million.
So, whereas Jolie might have handed on the adrenaline-fueled enjoyable of Charlie’s Angels, she made an ideal alternative that match her vibe. Generally, the highway much less traveled results in much more wild adventures!
For extra such updates, take a look at Hollywood Information.
Should Learn: When Salma Hayek Refused To Go Out With Donald Trump & He Tried To Humiliate Her For Being Brief: “He Known as & Left Me A Message…”
Comply with Us: Fb | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google Information