After greater than a decade of impassioned — and infrequently maddeningly semantic — debate over the idea of “elevated horror,” it doesn’t really feel like a coincidence that probably the most thrilling new voice in mainstream horror is a brilliant man who’s obsessive about scary basements.
Zach Cregger’s “Weapons” isn’t a basement film to almost the identical diploma that his 2022 debut “Barbarian” is a basement film (few issues are!), however this unhappy, sprawling, and fun-as-hell imaginative and prescient of suburban despair takes comparable pleasure in leveraging a high-concept premise for “low” style thrills. Or, what occurs in burying a nightmare beneath the floorboards till the grief and trauma it invariably represents will get subsumed by the full-body shiver of the truth that individuals had been dwelling on high of it the entire time.
That framing may need spoiled the primary twist of “Barbarian,” however I promise it doesn’t reveal something in the slightest degree ruinous about “Weapons.” For one factor, that is an ensemble movie with a plot that hinges much less on shock than it does a means of collective self-discovery. For one more, all of its most vital characters are attempting to cover their horror in plain sight to 1 diploma or one other — to construct new futures for themselves atop a shared basis of unimaginable loss.
By the point “Weapons” begins, that loss has already grown to shadow each road within the sleepy Japanese suburb of Maybrook. It stems from a weird incident one night time a month prior, when — at precisely 2:17 a.m. — all however one of many 18 college students in Justine Gandy’s third grade class received up from their beds, opened the entrance doorways of their homes, and ran off into the darkness with their arms unfold broad as in the event that they had been referred to as to it by a dinner bell (a spectacle unsettling sufficient to earn “Weapons” a spot within the horror pantheon earlier than it even arrives at its opening title card).
Nobody has seen a hint of the youngsters since, and in lieu of a greater choice their mother and father have turned their anger and confusion in direction of Justine (Julia Garner), whose seemingly meek demeanor makes the younger trainer an much more pure outlet for these emotions than she would have been already. She should know one thing. Have seen one thing. And brawny native dad Archer Graff (Josh Brolin), whose son is without doubt one of the lacking kids, is decided to seek out out what that one thing may be.
However Justine is simply as hellbent on getting solutions, and in her personal means simply as wounded and wobbly as she tries to muck her means by means of life with out them. A relapsing alcoholic whose delicate look belies each the tetchiness of an addict and the fortitude of a trainer, Justine turns into each bit as preoccupied with Alex (Cary Christopher) — the one remaining child from her class — as Archer is together with her, and people parallel investigations come to type the idea of a calmly non-linear plot that appears to assign half the individuals in Maybrook their very own result in pursue.
The movie is split right into a sequence of discrete however interconnected chapters, its characters circling each other just like the bullets of a loaded revolver. Ambivalent cop Paul (a mustached Alden Ehrenreich), who occurs to be Justine’s ex, will get more and more hung up on antagonizing an area meth addict (Austin Abrams) as his marriage to the police chief’s daughter falls aside. The mild faculty principal (Benedict Wong as Andrew) focuses his vitality in direction of ensuring that Alex is adjusting to his new class. Alex, in the meantime, passes the identical concern onto his mother and father, who’ve been paralyzed with shock ever since their son grew to become their city’s model of “the boy who lived.”
Someway, this film is humorous. Sporadically at first, after which uproariously by the top. Drawing from the instability he felt after the sudden dying of his The Whitest Children U’Know castmate and shut buddy Trevor Moore, Cregger meets every Maybrookian at their most susceptible second, and takes more and more giddy pleasure in exposing how powerless they’re to manage the place their grief and confusion leads them from there. It’s simple to push somebody who’s already wobbling, a indisputable fact that “Weapons” observes for its tragedy even because it spins in direction of a semi-coherent however very cathartic farce about free will — a farce through which damage individuals damage individuals till their all within the grip of another person’s ache.
Very like “Barbarian,” Cregger’s second characteristic makes use of horror to brighten comedy and vice-versa, blurring the strains between them to create an analogous borderlessness between victims and monsters. And very like “Barbarian,” “Weapons” — for all of its grandeur and confidence — isn’t notably thinking about mining that no man’s land for Large Concepts. There’s a stretch of this film the place it looks like it may be on the verge of diagnosing the damage that has impressed America to eat itself alive (search for it through the nightmare sequence through which somebody sees an enormous AR-15 floating within the clouds above them), however “Weapons” takes itself much less critically because it goes alongside.
In lieu of sugarcoating the potential of being made complete once more and/or overstating the extent to which a mutual understanding may permit these characters to determine their widespread enemy, the movie cannonballs into the grim absurdity of a world that’s misplaced management of itself. Hilarious and unhinged sufficient to compensate for the story’s minimal character depth (i.e. Archer’s complete schtick is that he’s vaguely divorced and regrets not having the ability to say “I like you” to his son) and superficial lore, the final quarter-hour of “Weapons” so completely braids summary psychic nervousness along with cartoon ultra-violence that it creates a elegant concord between sketch comedy and Kiyoshi Kurosawa horror. I instantly have an odd hankering to see The Lonely Island remake “Treatment.”
Even within the context of late-’90s masterpieces, nevertheless, Kurosawa isn’t the obvious filmmaker to quote as an affect right here. Epic by the non-standards of right this moment’s studio horror output, “Weapons” has lengthy been likened to a style riff on “Magnolia,” an unfavorable comparability that in the end misconstrues how this film operates.
Too small by half the place “Magnolia” was bursting on the seams, Cregger’s script is each much less propulsive and extra siloed than Paul Thomas Anderson’s biblical opus. One is a symphony, and the opposite a easy canon. The place “Magnolia” embraced an natural messiness, “Weapons” unfolds in a sequence of inflexible stanzas: We meet somebody in disaster, they try to fail to self-medicate, they search for solutions, bizarre shit occurs, and the cycle begins another time proper when the craziness is about to succeed in fever pitch. Each spherical of the track inches a personality that a lot nearer to the guts of the thriller, and likewise to one another, however each spherical additionally clarifies the horrible loneliness they’ve been struggling all of the whereas.
In that respect at the least, the “Magnolia” comparisons don’t appear too far off, however “Weapons” strikes with such an off-kilter gait that “Punch-Drunk Love” looks like the extra related PTA movie. Its plunky rating, its percussive vitality, its open-hearted characters in determined seek for a vessel to include their feelings… “Weapons” may need been a richer expertise if it doubled the scale of its solid and absolutely embraced the size of Anderson’s earlier work, however the film that Cregger made is simpler due to the way it collapses horror conference, reasonably than the way it explodes it.
The non-linear form of its story doesn’t simply permit “Weapons” to disguise the age-old style sample of rigidity and launch, it additionally permits Cregger to condense it till he’s fully elided the gap between horror and comedy, terror and aid, self-control and give up. This isn’t a puzzle film — there’s no enjoyable available in drawing a timeline or mapping out how the characters all relate to one another on a flat floor. Quite the opposite, what issues to “Weapons” is how they stack on high of one another just like the flooring of a home that’s been divided in opposition to itself. A home constructed by somebody who can’t bear to be alone with their ache.
“Lots of people die in a whole lot of actually bizarre methods on this story,” a baby whispers to us within the film’s opening narration, nevertheless it’s the weirdness — and the tragedy — of how these individuals stay on this story that makes “Weapons” so lethal in the long run.
Grade: B+
Warner Bros. will launch “Weapons” in theaters on Friday, August 8.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie evaluations and important ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Evaluation by David Ehrlich, through which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Critiques Editor rounds up the most effective new evaluations and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.