For followers of the mannered, ersatz verité of “The Bear” comes the brand new movie “Steve,” from Belgian director Tim Mielants. The Netflix movie, a couple of British reform faculty for troubled teenage boys, swaps the murmuring, sweaty-browed cooks of “The Bear” for murmuring, sweaty-browed instructors charged with the care of a handful of rambunctious adolescents. The stakes are increased than dinner service, however the internet impact is similar: “Steve” is one other trendy sham.
It’s an enervating sit, a movie manically hustling to distract its viewers from a void at its heart. Cillian Murphy performs the titular Steve, a beloved trainer at a controversial faculty that makes use of public funds to deal with violent and delinquent boys in a shabby outdated mansion. There, by some means, Steve and his coworkers hope to set their college students on a course towards productive citizenship. It’s 1996 and a digital camera crew for a information program has descended on the varsity, on the lookout for both an exposé of gross mismanagement or a delicate portrait of life-saving intervention.
It’s thus an enormous day for the establishment, however Mielants and screenwriter Max Porter — adapting from his personal novel, “Shy” — aren’t content material to depart it at that. Additionally occurring on this harried 24 hours: the dismaying announcement that the varsity can be shutting down in six months’ time, the suicidal ideation of a pupil, and a trainer in restoration drifting into relapse as he processes an ornate trauma. It’s rather a lot to deal with, however “Steve” figures that there’s profundity to be present in that loud and antic jumble, caught in tight closeup.
It figures unsuitable. The movie is attempting fairly arduous to be a bracing and immersive depiction of rehabilitation’s arduous toil. However “Steve” is as an alternative a pantomime, an offhanded approximation of labor that fails to convincingly present us the precise work. (Very like “The Bear”!) We by no means actually see Steve or his colleagues doing what they preserve insisting is so essential. Pedagogy is just hinted at on the sidelines of the image that Mielants truly needs to seize, one in all rigorously orchestrated chaos strenuously posed as realism.
Possibly I’m a curmudgeon, however to my thoughts many of the unexpectedly rendered youngsters of “Steve” appear with out redemption. They’re noisy, obnoxious, merciless, one-dimensional avatars of the movie’s broadly gestured-toward social ills, shorthand sketches of adolescent male id. Steve’s ardor for them, and that of his colleagues — involved, ill-defined ladies performed with shaggy heat by the good Tracey Ullman and Emily Watson — is defined to us however probably not justified. Mielants retains his film’s quantity at 11, robbing these youngsters (and their minders) of any quieter nuance which may humanize them.
It’s fascinating that, in his adaptation, Porter has shifted the main focus away from the novel’s central character, Shy — a very aggressive, soul-sick pupil — and onto Steve. Maybe there was a thought someplace within the manufacturing course of that nestling alongside the trainer, relatively than one of many youngsters, can be extra marketable — “Steve” usually performs as if somebody is saying “this ain’t your granddaddy’s ‘Harmful Minds.’” Regardless of the arithmetic, “Steve” has chosen a leadenly uninteresting protagonist. Murphy assaults the function with harrowed power, but it surely’s all in service of a personality who solely exists as a clichéd logline: what if the fixer of damaged youth is himself a bit bit damaged?
The true raison d’etre of “Steve” could merely be to showcase Mielants’ directorial aptitude. He retains his digital camera awfully busy, leaping and darting as if it too is a tireless, unpredictable teenage boy. From time to time, particularly because the movie builds to its lugubrious finale, Mielants tries different tips, simulating lengthy monitoring photographs that appear to glide via the varsity after which out onto the grounds. Whether or not or not that’s truly what we’re watching — we are able to see the digital glint of some type of laptop manipulation in these sequences — the prospers solely serve to spotlight what’s missing within the movie. “Steve” is all dressed up, however goes nowhere.
There are such a lot of urgent issues left on the desk: points of sophistication, race, and gender that Mielants and Porter indicate however by no means correctly discover. The movie’s chief sin is its effortful posture of compassion for the plight of those boys, and people like them in the actual world. The movie phases its riot of exercise as hard-nosed honesty, however its portrait is finally as ginned-up and inexact because the fictional information broadcast’s lurid prying. “Steve” treats suicide as suspense, sexual assault as nuisance, habit as plot twist, and training as an abstraction that doesn’t advantage element. Having spent a fruitless and irritating day there, I’d shut the varsity down, too.
Grade: C-
“Steve” premiered on the 2025 Toronto Worldwide Movie Pageant. Netflix will launch the movie in theaters on Friday, September 19, and it’ll stream on the platform beginning on Friday, October 3.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Overview by David Ehrlich, through which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the most effective new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.