On January 8, 2021, Donald Trump Jr. took to X (then Twitter) to declare that his father’s suspension from the platform was an indication that “We live in Orwell’s ‘1984.’ Free speech not exists in America.” The irony that the elder Trump’s actions main to the ban — spreading false info that the 2020 election was rigged on the platform and instantly inflicting an tried rebel of the U.S. Capitol constructing — match much more into George Orwell’s traditional dystopian novel and its imaginative and prescient of a future dominated by misinformation and propaganda is one which Jr. was seemingly solely unaware of.
It was an indication of how, despite the cultural ubiquity the brief, pioneering 1949 science fiction novel has obtained — introducing phrases like “Huge Brother,” “doublethink,” and “thoughtcrime” into the cultural lexicon and remaining a staple of highschool curriculums in its native Britain and throughout the pond in the US — a frighteningly great amount of individuals appear incapable of processing what Orwell’s imaginative and prescient of a future dominated by worry, surveillance, and a controlling superstate truly means, and the way near house it hits in our present political panorama.
So if Raoul Peck‘s new documentary “Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5” may typically really feel prefer it’s preaching to the choir, drawing comparisons between fashionable politics and the terrors of Oceania that loads of lecturers have already made, maybe it’s finest to remember that for a lot of viewers, its conclusions might be far much less apparent.
Peck, a Haitian filmmaker whose work has all the time had a robust political bent, is finest identified for his 2016 essay movie “I Am Not Your Negro,” which makes use of the unfinished James Baldwin manuscript “Keep in mind This Home” because the skeleton for an examination of the deaths of Medgar Evers, Malcolm X, and Martin Luther King, Jr. “Orwell” performs like a religious successor to his Oscar-nominated breakthrough, mixing Orwell’s writings and letters — narrated by “Homeland” star Damian Lewis — with archival pictures, footage from numerous variations of “1984” (together with the 1956 model starring Edmund O’Brien as bureaucrat Winston and the model starring John Harm launched on the precise 12 months), footage from different motion pictures starting from “Oliver Twist” to “Notting Hill,” and modern-day information experiences to argue how Orwell’s fears of a totalitarian state have already come true.
The end result isn’t as riveting as “I Am Not Your Negro” — it feels much less private and extra generic, like a time period paper somebody might have written in undergrad. Nonetheless, Peck makes his factors nicely, and accomplishes what he units out to do by getting your blood stress rising.
The movie begins with textual content explaining how, in 1946, Orwell decamped to Jura, an island off the coast of Scotland, the place he would spend the remaining 4 years of his life engaged on a manuscript that may turn out to be “1984.” Reasonably than taking the standard path of specializing in Orwell’s life throughout this time, nevertheless, Peck is extra concerned about how the concepts the creator developed in Jura nonetheless really feel so related in the present day. Loosely, the movie buildings itself across the well-known doublethink social gathering motto of Oceania: “Conflict is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is energy,” utilizing every part as one other avenue into exploring fashionable fascism.
Peck casts a large internet in who he applies to his gaze to, wanting broadly on the rise of alt-right actions throughout the globe, from the USA to Europe to Asia. “Conflict is Peace” incorporates footage of George Bush declaring conflict on Iraq, in addition to disturbing footage of each Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Israel’s genocide of Palestine. Through “Freedom is Slavery,” Peck takes a take a look at how fashionable fascist and right-wing actions construct complicity inside their bases, in addition to the rising earnings inequality disaster occurring globally. With “Ignorance is Energy,” the movie friends into the rampant misinformation brought on by conservative information retailers and rising anti-intellectualism and guide banning.
Unsurprisingly although, a really massive portion of the movie facilities round Donald Trump, and the way his cult of character, his disregard for the reality and apparent lies, and his willingness to subvert democracy all show eerily just like the omnipresent, unseen Huge Brother of “1984.” In lots of respects, the movie already feels old-fashioned, principally overlaying Trump’s crimes throughout his first time period in addition to the January 6 Capitol rebel relatively than dipping into the extra flagrant fascism of his previous few months again in workplace. And, in relitigating controversies which have been been pecked and prodded at for years at this level, “Orwell” typically winds up making factors you’ve in all probability learn in 100 on-line essays already.
Nonetheless, as pat as some extent of reference as “1984” and the phrase “Orwellian” has turn out to be on the web, that doesn’t imply Peck doesn’t make the comparisons nicely. His analysis is thorough and persuasive, and infrequently finds a brand new, refreshing angle to use the evaluation, reminiscent of one section that explores how AI-generated “artwork” ties again to the themes of the novel. On a technical stage, “Orwell” is sharply made, cross-cutting between “1984” footage and modern-day interviews to permit the viewers to bridge the hole on their very own phrases, with solely occasional graphics used as an example notably disturbing or stark statistics when wanted. It helps that Lewis is a superb narrator, giving his model of Orwell an ideal contact of wry humor in his voice that makes among the extra upsetting moments simpler to abdomen.
With the movie’s sociological critiques so pointed, “2 + 2 = 5” loses its edge each time it sporadically makes an attempt to incorporate materials fleshing out Orwell’s life outdoors of his most well-known creation. His different well-known allegory for Stalinist Russia, “Animal Farm,” will get a short acknowledgement, however the different work goes largely ignored. Sparse content material about his private life — together with the dying of his first spouse Eileen O’Shaughnessy and the way his second Sonia Brownell impressed the character of Julia in “1984” — feels vestigial relatively than illuminating.
Most irritating, Orwell’s limitations each politically and personally — particularly the sexism, homophobia, and classism that often seeped into his novels and essays — don’t obtain a lot implicit or specific acknowledgement inside the movie. A revealing little bit of narration from Orwell notes how, as a younger man, “he was each a snob and a revolutionary,” an Eton-educated member of the center class whose socialism was based mostly extra on principle than wrestle. However Peck doesn’t take the time to look into how that background affected his portrayal of the proles in “1984” as unwashed, undignified plenty. You could possibly learn one thing radical into Peck’s option to take the phrases of a white British man who by no means had a lot, if something, to say about race in his writings and apply his ideas to modern-day systemic racism: one section compiles a number of quotes from Trump concerning the Black group juxtaposed with pretend AI photos he used for his marketing campaign in 2024, whereas footage from the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests is prominently featured.
“1984” famously ends on a pitch black be aware of despair: Winston has been damaged by the Celebration’s torture and launched again into the world as a complacent puppet, one who passively writes 2 + 2 = 5 on a espresso desk whereas declaring his love for Huge Brother. Peck’s movie climaxes with a montage of this sequence as depicted within the novel’s numerous movie variations, nevertheless it ends by looping round to an earlier part of the guide, the place Winston muses to himself that “If there was hope, it should lie within the proles, as a result of solely there, in these swarming disregarded plenty, eighty-five p.c of the inhabitants of Oceania, might the drive to destroy the Celebration ever be generated.”
In some respects, this attraction to the frequent man conclusion feels a bit false, given how uncompromising Orwell was at denying his viewers catharsis. Nonetheless, one has to take account of the completely different capabilities Orwell and Peck’s works serve: whereas Orwell wrote “1984” as a warning of the place the world may very well be headed, Peck made a movie concerning the world we already stay in. How do you discover the energy wanted, residing in totalitarianism, to imagine that issues can change for the higher?
“My chief hope for the longer term,” Lewis narrates as Orwell because the movie attracts to its shut, “is that the frequent individuals have by no means parted firm with their ethical code.”
Grade: B-
“Orwell: 2 + 2 = 5” had its world premiere on the 2025 Cannes Movie Pageant. Neon will distribute the movie in the US.
Need to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie evaluations and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Overview by David Ehrlich, during which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Opinions Editor rounds up the very best new evaluations and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.