Nicole Kidman didn’t simply play Becca in Rabbit Gap—she virtually turned her. And never in some “methodology actor” manner. No, Kidman plunged so deep into the grief of shedding a baby that she ended up producing the rattling film too. Why? As a result of she had one thing to show. To herself, Hollywood, and anybody who thought a movie about loss might be too darkish to promote.
Rabbit Gap isn’t your common tearjerker. It’s uncooked and brutally sincere. Kidman’s character, Becca, a grieving mom, wrestles with rage, grief, and hopelessness after shedding her son. Her feelings hit arduous—neck muscle groups bulging, palms twisting. Kidman made it actual, not holding again an oz. of the ache. “It was actually uncooked, and I felt it was real and delicate,” Kidman alluded. Yeah, there’s no sugar-coating right here.
However maintain up—this movie wasn’t only a “give me the script and I’ll act” type of deal for Kidman. She went full throttle, from producing the film to deciding how everybody on set would pee. You heard that proper. Kidman didn’t desire a Hollywood-sized price range for this grief story.
As an alternative, she raised the money herself, hunted down director John Cameron Mitchell (who gave us Hedwig and the Indignant Inch), and even took management of the little issues, like lavatory logistics. Neglect fancy trailers—Kidman insisted everybody might share a room and a port-a-loo. “After I realized how a lot trailers price, I stated we don’t want trailers on this movie,” she asserted. “Let’s simply get a port-a-loo and put it out the again.” Speak about reducing prices and taking cost.
And it wasn’t simply the price range that was a tricky promote. The distributors thought Rabbit Gap was too correct—too uncooked to make a buck. Grief doesn’t exactly scream “blockbuster.” However Kidman didn’t care. She took on the monetary burden herself, refusing to again down. “There may be a lot waste since you simply don’t know,” she stated, explaining how usually the Hollywood machine throws money down the drain. And he or she wasn’t having it. With a modest $3.5M price range, Kidman made certain Rabbit Gap didn’t waste a cent.
And it wasn’t simply the cash that Kidman invested—she poured her soul into the position. Becca was so deeply ingrained in her thoughts that she began displaying up in her desires. Speak about methodology appearing. “My character infiltrated my desires,” she confessed. Becca was a lot part of Kidman’s psyche that she couldn’t even escape her at evening.
John Cameron Mitchell, who directed the movie, was additionally stepping out of his consolation zone. Recognized for guiding his low-budget indie movies (Hedwig and Shortbus), this was the primary time Mitchell was employed to direct another person’s challenge. And that somebody was Nicole Kidman—a lady who was primarily calling the photographs. Mitchell was hesitant at first.
“I wasn’t certain what it might be prefer to direct the one that did the hiring,” he admitted. However Mitchell dove in along with his connection to grief—and it labored.
Rabbit Gap was an announcement.
Take a look at the newest Hollywood Information!
Should Learn: Did Jessica Alba Remorse Her Function As Sue Storm In Unbelievable 4: Rise Of The Silver Surfer?
Observe Us: Fb | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google Information