At a sure level in Celine Track‘s sophomore function “Materialists,” her follow-up to her much-loved “Previous Lives,” I began to fixate on one thing a bit unusual: the Manhattan workplace wherein our lead Lucy (Dakota Johnson) spends her days making an attempt to rearrange enduring romantic matches amongst the NYC elite. At first look, the crowded and colourful workplace appears luxe; it’s lined with desks and full of keen matchmakers like Lucy, effervescent with female power and pleasure. When a match goes very well — i.e. when the couple will get engaged, the ballyhooed blissful ending of all romances, naturally — a bar cart is rolled out and all of the younger matchmakers collect round one another and cheer for his or her luck, and for the seeming success of affection itself. They’ve performed it! Love wins! The charges they acquire for his or her companies don’t harm, both.
But, the extra time we spend in Lucy’s workplace, the cheaper, the sadder, the darker it appears to be like. These desks? They appear as if they are going to collapse at any minute, smushed into one another as if we have been at some no-nonsense nail salon, no room to breathe, no area to assume. The bar cart? It’s wobbly. When all of it will get an excessive amount of, even Lucy heads straight to the hearth escape to get some air. It’s, fairly merely, by no means what it appears to be like like at first blush.
Neither is “Materialists.”
You’d be forgiven for taking the advertising bait on this one (even we did!), as a result of whereas Track’s second movie might look, on the floor, like a shiny rom-com throwback about a good looking girl (Johnson) cut up between two good-looking males (Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans) as they wine and dine round a glittering Manhattan, “Materialists” is not a romantic comedy. It’s not even a comedy, and your learn on how romantic it’s shall be completely fueled by how prepared you might be to grapple with a topic that rom-coms seldom broach: the bounds of what love can do for somebody.
Cynical, unhappy, more and more fucked up, and sometimes gloriously imply, Track has turned the style inside out to indicate us how shallow these tales may be. Briefly, think about if the decree {that a} movie facilities on “the love you may solely discover on the motion pictures” wasn’t a praise, however a stern provocation. And whereas Track shouldn’t be all the time profitable at this problem, the result’s compelling, darkish, and worthy of appreciable dialogue.
Did you actually assume Celine Track, already one in every of our greatest chroniclers of what love really is, would make a shiny little rom-com about good, blissful individuals? Please.
It opens, hilariously sufficient, with a vignette centered on the romantic rituals of cavepeople. Even they, Track argues, engaged in courtship actions, weighing the deserves of their paramours towards the wants of the true world. And when two of her cavepeople make it official, it’s not a lot a contented event because the inciting incident for a number of millennia of fine (and dangerous) unions.
For Lucy, love is a transaction. Her shoppers are items. The relationship scene? It’s a market. No marvel she’s been so profitable at matchmaking (Johnson’s naturally cool reserve works wonders for the function), her work steeped in operating the numbers and evaluating execs and cons, assessing potential romance like one may contemplate a enterprise deal. Her numerous shoppers usually are not all the time of the identical thoughts, nonetheless, and as Track pushes Johnson via more and more terrible, impersonal, and darkly humorous conferences (ladies who solely need tall males, males who solely need youthful ladies, and worse), it’s straightforward to see why Lucy has turn into so scientific.
A flashback, impressed by operating into her ex John (Evans, working within the form of downbeat register we haven’t seen from him in years) on the wedding ceremony of two of her shoppers, additional illuminates issues: John and Lucy first got here to the town years in the past, itching for fulfillment, and too poor to even afford not only a full night out in town, however the parking charges for a single stint in a parking storage. Sick to loss of life of being poor, Lucy ended issues with John. Years later, their love for one another remains to be obvious, however so is the monetary divide between them: John has but to make it as an actor and is as an alternative cater-waiting on the wedding ceremony, Lucy is there as a cherished visitor.
Additionally on supply on the wedding ceremony: the groom’s good-looking brother Harry (an interesting Pascal), the form of “unicorn” Lucy would love to repair up with a few of her very keen feminine shoppers. However Harry is taken with Lucy, even when she’s crystal clear: the primary factor she is in search of in a possible husband is that he’s wealthy. The quantity two factor is that he’s wealthy. She is, in spite of everything, a materialist. Luckily, Harry is wealthy! And, as we come to be taught, he’s additionally very a lot of the identical thoughts of Lucy about what romance is. A transaction. A deal. A merger.
As Harry and Lucy swan in regards to the metropolis on more and more luxurious dates, John lingers on the fringe of Lucy’s thoughts. What if love actually was about love? Not cash or security or extremely good penthouses (the primary evening they spend collectively at Harry’s, Lucy seems to extra revved up by the swanky unfold than Harry’s livid kisses)? Properly, Lucy positive as hell ain’t the individual to interrogate that.
Till she is. As Lucy — analytic, chilly, and completely conscious of her emotional deficiencies — makes an attempt to juggle a most surprising inner battle, one thing occurs that even she couldn’t predict or stop. For all her planning, for all her precision, for all her “let’s take the emotion out of romance and get you married!” gusto, Lucy merely can’t management individuals and what they are going to do. That this horrific upheaval comes care of Lucy’s work is the true kicker. If her trusted skilled strategies can fail so terribly, what does that say about the best way she conducts her private life?
That destabilization is sufficient to push Lucy into new areas, each anticipated and never. Who will she select? John, who may not have a pot to piss in (and, even when he did, he’d need to share it along with his many roommates), however sees Lucy as she is and nonetheless desires to be together with her? Harry, who absolutely understands how love ought to look and transfer, and solely makes use of that as a defend to his actual self? Speak about dangerous choices.
However whereas Track is raring to interact with these concepts — with the very nature of affection itself, no small feat — even “Materialists” can’t escape the pull of wrapping issues up in a tidy bow full of huge reveals and greater proclamations. Or is that every one a part of a deeper trick, a wilder swing? Love itself might stay a thriller, however the best way “Materialists” feels about it’s not. Simply don’t fall for the shiny package deal.
Grade: B
A24 will launch “Materialists” in theaters on Friday, June 13.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie opinions and important ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Evaluation by David Ehrlich, wherein our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the very best new opinions and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.