About halfway by his new documentary “Life After,” director Reid Davenport broadcasts, “This movie just isn’t about suicide.” It’s a press release that runs counter to the best a logline for the Sundance premiere, which might say that the venture is an exploration of assisted suicide within the disabled neighborhood.
On the heart of that examine is the story of Elizabeth Bouvia, whose case grew to become a nationwide sensation within the ’80s. However as Davenport articulates each in his assertion referenced above and all through his passionate and persuasive movie, the query of whether or not disabled individuals deserve the fitting to die can also be a query of whether or not they’re afforded the power to dwell.
Davenport himself speaks from a spot of expertise, which makes him uniquely positioned to inform this story. He himself has cerebral palsy, and received the Impartial Spirit More true than Fiction Award for his first function, 2022’s “I Didn’t See You There,” which digs into the traditions of freak exhibits to spin a deeply private narrative. In “Life After,” Davenport each challenges an able-bodied viewers’s preconceptions in regards to the lives of disabled individuals, in addition to upends the expectations of how documentaries are alleged to unfold.
The movie opens with archival footage of Elizabeth Bouvia showing in courtroom. You may see why Bouvia’s saga was instantly interesting to the media. As one headline famous on the time: She was younger, stunning and wished to die. (Mike Wallace adopted her for years; Davenport calls him “creepy.”) Born with cerebral palsy, Bouvia, with excessive cheekbones and formed eyebrows, argued in entrance of a courtroom in Riverside, California that she ought to be capable to starve herself to loss of life at a neighborhood hospital. She misplaced the case.
What first intrigued Davenport about Bouvia’s story is that when he researched her, he couldn’t discover any proof that she had, the truth is, died all these years later. However “Life After” isn’t any easy investigation into discovering this lady, though Davenport does function with the philosophy that understanding what occurred to her within the years following the general public frenzy can be key to understanding her. Extra importantly, nonetheless, it’s an expansive take a look at what it means when disabled persons are informed they’ve a proper to die.
Bouvia is only one character on this story. One other is Michal Kaliszan, a person in Canada who misplaced his mom, his major caretaker, and regarded dying by the nation’s MAiD (Medical Help in Dying) program. Although he works, the price of full time care can be an excessive amount of, and the one different choice can be going to a facility that appears like an incarceration.
However whereas the movie begins with an empathy for why individuals would possibly need to die, it slowly begins to uncover the systematic failures that make these with disabilities imagine it’s their solely choice. By structuring the narrative on this approach, Davenport slyly challenges the supposedly good liberal determination about assisted suicide as an act of compassion. What begins as a sluggish prodding of assumptions finally finally ends up a full throated condemnation of techniques that will relatively have disabled individuals die than put money into the healthcare required to reinforce their lives.
Canada’s embrace of MAiD is on the heart of Davenport’s case, with the statistics that the federal government’s hearty embrace of this system has resulted in a type of eugenics. He additionally weaves within the story of Michael Hickson, a person paralyzed with a mind harm who wasn’t handled for COVID at an Austin hospital. His spouse, Melissa, heartbroken and indignant at his loss, offers a number of the most transferring testimony.
Davenport is solely centered on the subject of assisted suicide because it pertains to incapacity. He isn’t curious about diving into the way it applies to terminal sickness in any respect. For anybody who argues that makes “Life After” one-sided, Davenport’s personal voice offers a livid counterpart to that. Davenport is taken into account in how he inserts himself on display. His pull towards Elizabeth’s story is that he sees himself in her, however he additionally lets his topics inform their tales with out interruption. Sometimes throughout the interviews, you see his curly hair bobbing on the aspect of the display, a reminder of his vested curiosity. That framing is at occasions cinematically awkward, however it’s thematically potent.
On the identical time, Davenport needs to remind his viewers that if he hadn’t had the alternatives afforded to him, he would possibly select to die too. It’s a sentiment that’s crystalized when he fills out the MAiD software. That he’s capable of direct “Life After” helps his idea that when persons are given the right healthcare they will thrive.
And he does all the time carry his story again to Bouvia, who looms over the whole lot. As a result of the movie begins with this query of what occurred to her, it looks as if a spoiler to disclose what Davenport uncovers. It’s secure to say, nonetheless, that what Davenport finds is shocking and sophisticated.
What Davenport says is true: This film just isn’t about suicide, which might imply it might be about loss of life. Slightly, it’s about life, life that’s way more complicated than the soundbite clips from the previous may give.
Grade: A-
“Life After” premiered on the 2025 Sundance Movie Pageant. It’s at the moment in search of U.S. distribution.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie opinions and important ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Overview by David Ehrlich, during which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the most effective new opinions and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.