“Kim Novak‘s Vertigo” has one of many extra heartwarming and, frankly, traditionally important, codas to a film-focused documentary in latest reminiscence. It’s such a particular second that it principally justifies the way in which the movie has been assembled earlier than it.
Till then, it’s fairly an uneven and unstructured cinematic portrait, and one of many weaker efforts from its director Alexandre O. Philippe. The Swiss-born cinephile has develop into a sort of cross between Laurent Bouzereau and Mark Cousins together with his succession of documentaries about iconic movies and movie topics.
Novak is actually a worthy topic for a documentary. She’s not solely the final survivor of the movie that many contemplate the best ever made, Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo,” however she is the nexus of obsession in a movie about obsession that has impressed a lot obsession within the 67 years since its launch itself. At 92, her star energy is as grand and luxurious as ever. However greater than commanding your gaze as any nice star does, and as Hitchcock actually did in that final movie about “the gaze,” Novak additionally holds your consideration as a uniquely considerate artist in her personal proper.
Philippe takes us on a journey by her profession. Born Marilyn Novak and assigned the identify Kim by the tyrannical Columbia Photos head Harry Cohn, Novak existed in a continuing state of pressure in Hollywood. She bristled in opposition to what she calls the “overdone” performing of ’50s film stars and prized naturalistic “reacting” as a substitute. And she or he wished meatier, extra substantive roles that the business merely wouldn’t give her on the time: Having labored as a mannequin, Novak, to the powers that be, embodied glamour above all else, and the moguls had no use for different sorts of which means she might create and symbolize. They wished to concentrate on her floor attraction, on her mystique. That she was a supply of want quite than a subjective drive in her personal proper.
If something, Novak herself added depth and dimension that the fits didn’t need or ask for of their want to make her the business’s number-one field workplace star — which, within the late ’50s, she certainly grew to become. The variety of nice movies to her identify, then, is arguably restricted: Joshua Logan’s “Picnic,” Otto Preminger’s “The Man with the Golden Arm,” Richard Quine’s “Bell, E-book, and Candle,” and naturally, “Vertigo.”
“Kim Novak’s Vertigo” exhibits a number of the misogynistic indignities she needed to endure onscreen, with clips from “Pal Joey” and “Kiss Me, Silly” that in all probability added to Novak’s final want to go away Hollywood altogether, which she had principally achieved by the late ’60s. The documentary is most fascinating when it doesn’t linger on clips from her films, however when it focuses on her within the current at her house in Oregon. An avid painter for many years, Novak is seen at her easel placing brush to canvas and creating work of extraordinary swirling, whirlpool-like complexity. One undoubtedly thinks of the spiral motif in “Vertigo.” And in a number of works, she’s outright created her personal model of “Vertigo” fan artwork, recreating photographs of her Madeleine and Judy from the movie.
“Vertigo” has clearly haunted her the way in which that it has generations of movie lovers. Except for its repute and its inherent creative greatness on many ranges, it’s the one time in any film that Novak was in a position to interrogate the very factor that annoyed her a lot about her Hollywood profession: That the business was unable to see past the floor of her. And so she talks at size about how the characters of Madeleine and Judy converse to her deeply and stay together with her and a part of her. She talks about “Vertigo” as if each an insider and outsider — sure, she’s within the film and the very coronary heart of it, however, maybe due to Hitchcock’s manner of transferring actors round like chess items, as objects for him to regulate, the way in which she talks about it’s nonetheless considerably eliminated, like that was one other particular person onscreen and her on the identical time.
That signifies that, when she speaks about “Vertigo,” it’s not that completely different from what any diehard obsessive of it must say, at the same time as her expertise is basically singular. It lays naked the gulf between what’s onscreen and what’s actual life, fairly potently. Between the floor and what lies beneath. Between Kim Novak the film star and Kim Novak the particular person.
She’s articulate and looking out all through, the film even opening with narration that you simply would possibly suppose had come from Jonas Mekas greater than from Novak — due to course on the top of her fame she wasn’t allowed to be expressive like this. “I hesitate to even be recording this as a result of I don’t know what’s gonna come out of what I say, what I imply,” she started. “What do I imply? Is that what it’s about: What do I imply? What do I believe? What do I really feel? I don’t know what’s anticipated of me to really feel, or to suppose, and even to be, for that matter.”
In each sense, what’s most fascinating about “Kim Novak’s Vertigo” comes from Novak herself. Philippe’s filmmaking appears particularly rudimentary right here, way over in his William Shatner portrait “You Can Name Me Invoice.” It’s highly effective and compelling that Novak can occupy the function of fan of “Vertigo” the way in which she does — much less fascinating is Philippe’s personal fan gushing. He has deserted the shut textual evaluation of his different Hitchcock research, “78/52,” which exactly dissected how the “Psycho” bathe scene achieves its impact, in favor of selecting to not give a lot perspective right here in any respect. He simply needs to revel within the feeling of “Vertigo,” the sensation of understanding Kim Novak, this time round — not study what’s on the root of these emotions.
As a movie then, “Kim Novak’s Vertigo” is disappointing. It appears like a gorgeous portrait and not using a body. A worthy companion to her receiving the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement on the 2025 Venice Movie Pageant, however not a lot of a cinematic achievement in its personal proper.
And but, simply as “Kim Novak’s Vertigo” seems to occupy that area of 2024’s “Service provider/Ivory” documentary — one other doc made by a fan with out a lot to say apart from gush — it contains a coda of jolting consequence. Novak goes by her belongings, collected over many years and in containers for all that point, and comes upon what often is the most iconic suit-dress in film historical past. The gray swimsuit that Madeleine had worn and that Judy wears on the finish of “Vertigo” within the second that she’s revealed to have been Madeleine all alongside. It’s been sitting in a field in Novak’s possession for 67 years.
She pulls it out, and it’s nonetheless smooth and completely unfaded as if it have been 1958 over again. She sniffs it, to make it that rather more part of herself. And cries in gratitude over seeing it once more and being with it once more. All of the sudden, movie historical past is so very alive in that second. Fast and everlasting unexpectedly. Identical to “Vertigo.”
Grade: B-
“Kim Novak’s Vertigo” premiered on the 2025 Venice Movie Pageant. It’s at present looking for U.S. distribution.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and significant ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Assessment by David Ehrlich, through which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the very best new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.