You’d be forgiven in case your moviegoing curiosity within the legacyquel — a intelligent time period for a next-gen sequel to a well-liked, sometimes very nostalgic movie that former IndieWire editor Matt Singer coined over a decade in the past — has waned. Once more, Singer spotlighted the phenomenon over a decade in the past, and franchise-mad Hollywood reveals no indicators of breaking with the sample. “Tron: Ares” is quick approaching, and, simply final week, Netflix launched “Glad Gilmore 2.” Prior to now 12 months alone, we’ve had “Karate Child: Legends,” “Gladiator II,” and “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.” Mileage on these titles very a lot varies, as does vital response and viewers enjoyment.
Go away it to Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan to crack the code as to what makes an excellent legacyquel, which they’ve performed fairly handily with their long-gestating “Freaky Friday” sequel, Nisha Ganatra’s charming and fairly enjoyable “Freakier Friday.” The key? Fittingly sufficient, it harkens again to precisely what Curtis and Lohan dropped at Mark Waters’ 2003 “Freaky Friday”: precise verve, apparent pleasure, and performances which can be about thrice higher than they have to be.
In case you’re of the thoughts that Curtis ought to have received her first Oscar for her work in Waters’ movie, because of a spectacular and extremely humorous flip as overworked mother Tess Coleman, who switches our bodies along with her wise-ass teenage daughter (Lohan), resulting in every kind of excessive jinks, “Freakier Friday” could be very a lot for you. Twenty-two years in the past, Curtis turned in a few of her greatest work as a sassy rocker teenager trapped within the physique of her strait-laced mother, and revisiting that idea is greater than sufficient cause to launch a sequel. The twist? Lohan ably matches Curtis’ vim and vigor, and a pair of younger stars give them a critical run for his or her cash as their body-switching compatriots.
Merely put: Here’s a legacyquel well worth the wait. What an idea!
Written by Jordan Weiss (who shares story-by credit score with Elyse Hollander), the sequel makes an early declare to one thing form of difficult: Sure, it’s going to like its varied characters and their very completely different generational markers, but it surely’s certain as heck gonna poke some enjoyable at them, too.
Greater than 20 years on from the primary movie, we discover Tess (Curtis) nonetheless working as a therapist, now armed with a podcast she’s making an attempt to launch, regardless of her Boomer tendencies to not really report the rattling factor. Anna (Lohan) is a single mother with a hip profession as a music supervisor, however she’s additionally susceptible to making an attempt woo-woo deep-breathing strategies to ease her stress. And Anna’s teenage daughter Harper (Julia Butters)? She’s acquired a “no triggering” signal on her bed room and attends a highschool the place “gluten-free” is the default providing for any and all foodstuffs.
Nonetheless, the Coleman women actually love one another, and as Tess tells us in voiceover, when Anna determined to develop into a single mother all these years in the past, she vowed they’d elevate Harper collectively. Intergenerational parenting! Thank God that Tess and Anna are armed with some deep, hard-fought empathy for one another (thanks, all the pieces that occurred in “Freaky Friday”), however that doesn’t inure them from powerful stuff to come back. Certainly, it’s nothing slightly double body-switching can’t treatment?
The fourth member of this ill-fated quad quickly comes into focus: British switch scholar Lily (Sophia Hammons), who can not stand laidback surf bum Harper (the sensation is mutual). When the ladies’ deep dislike for one another explodes into chem lab violence, their single (very, very a lot single) mother and father are compelled right into a parent-teacher assembly for the ages. The sparks are on the spot for Anna and Lily’s dad Eric (Manny Jacinto), and a zippy montage races us via their speedy romance, straight into an autumn marriage ceremony that, like many issues in Ganatra’s movie, sweetly echoes the unique.
However the days main as much as the nuptials aren’t all flowers and puppies, and when all 4 women are compelled to combine and mingle at Anna’s bachelorette get together… properly, you possibly can in all probability see the swapping to come back, or not less than the want for the swapping to come back. This time round, it comes courtesy of a completely hilarious Vanessa Bayer as a multi-hyphenate psychic who can’t appear to nail any of her many roles (Reiki to Starbucks, enterprise card-making to one thing involving canine?), however has by some means harnessed the ability to swap the our bodies and souls of 4 ladies. (The movie is entertaining sufficient to paper over some small plot holes, however audiences must be ready to stroll out of the theater glad and a bit confused over the finer factors of what the heck simply occurred.)
Quickly sufficient, Anna and Harper have switched (Butters nails the uptight-adult-in-kid-body ask, whereas Lohan will get to dabble within the teenage enjoyable she wasn’t capable of within the first movie), together with Lily and Tess (if this was all a bid to get Curtis again to taking part in nutso teenagers in her grownup physique, the total power of her efficiency makes that reasoning arduous to argue with). Whereas Anna and Tess naturally crew as much as attempt to reverse issues — and the way enjoyable for everybody else to see “Harper and Lily” hanging out — Harper and Lily provide you with a distinct concept: They’ll use this as a possibility to interrupt up their mother and father lastly.
Take into account it a reverse “Mother or father Lure,” and Curtis and Lohan go wild with the chances, the 2 actresses clearly delighting in attending to go on this new journey collectively (if the primary movie was lacking something, it was the fizzy enjoyable of seeing the pair sharing the display screen). And whereas a lot of what they tackle is, properly, form of foolish — contemplate a long-form montage sequence wherein the duo attempt on wacky outfits with Anna’s rising star shopper Ella (Maitreyi Ramakrishnan) — the apparent pleasure with which that stuff is approached is contagious.
It looks as if the simplest ask — let’s make this “Freaky Friday” sequel as entertaining and humorous as the primary one! — however simply take a look at a decade-plus price of dour, dim, and dismal fellow legacyquels, and it’s clear how uncommon “Freakier Friday” actually is. Whereas most of the beats would possibly really feel acquainted, there’s one thing cozy about these story factors (that the movie is centered on a marriage, similar to the unique, largely feels proper), and even some early tonal points are forgotten because the movie ratchets up its enthusiasm and good humor.
Curtis and Lohan’s dedication naturally extends to some bouts of dizzying bodily comedy, a number of the greatest examples going down at (gasp!) at a report retailer belonging to at least Jake (returning co-star Chad Michael Murray), who romanced each Coleman women within the first movie. As Lohan makes an attempt to flirt in such a manner that it makes her appear to be she’s having a medical emergency, and Curtis finds herself crawling and joint-cracking round practically each inch of the joint’s ground, one other form of spell takes maintain — this time, on the viewers. One of the best you are able to do? Embrace it. One thing like this would possibly solely come round as soon as each 22 years.
Grade: B+
Walt Disney Photos will launch “Freakier Friday” in theaters on Friday, August 8.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched e-newsletter, In Evaluate by David Ehrlich, wherein our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the most effective new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.