“Oscar bait” is a time period for motion pictures that appear designed to garner awards consideration. They’re often topical, or they promote social justice and progressive values in a roundabout way or one other. Emilia Pérez may be very near turning into synonymous with that time period, making an attempt a multicultural crime story with main trans illustration, led by a solid of robust girls. It labored, garnering 13 Oscar nominations on the 97th Academy Awards, however currently, the backlash has been deafening, largely due to outdated social media messages from its Oscar-nominated star, Karla Sofia Gascon.
What Did Karla Sofía Gascón Say That Was So Controversial?
Emilia Perez
3.5
/5
- Launch Date
-
November 13, 2024
- Runtime
-
130 Minutes
Gascón has been below hearth ever since lots of her tweets resurfaced, largely due to journalist Sarah Hagi. The social media posts shattered all of the liberal good will that Gascón had as the primary publicly open trans actor to be nominated for Greatest Actress on the Academy Awards. It is fairly ugly. On Nov. 22, 2020, Gascón wrote on the social media platform, “I’m Sorry, Is it simply my impression or is there extra muslims in Spain? Each time I’m going to choose up my daughter from faculty there are extra girls with their hair lined and their skirts all the way down to their heels. Subsequent yr as an alternative of English we’ll have to show Arabic.”
Associated
Are ‘Emilia Pérez’s Oscar Possibilities Utterly Lifeless?
Does the embattled Greatest Image contender nonetheless have an opportunity? And the way does the Gascon scandal evaluate to different notorious Oscar controversies?
It looks as if Muslims have been a constant goal of Gascón’s. On Sept. 2, 2020, she posted a picture of a Muslim household at a restaurant and sarcastically wrote, “Islam is marvelous, with none machismo. Ladies are revered, and when they’re so revered they’re left with a bit of squared gap on their faces for his or her eyes to be seen and their mouths, however provided that she behaves. Though they gown this manner for their very own enjoyment. How DEEPLY DISGUSTING OF HUMANITY.” (The emphasis is Gascón’s.) The actress’ bitter bile was directed at many extra folks, although. In June 2020, Gascón wrote:
“Actually, I feel that only a few folks ever cared about George Floyd, a drug addict swindler, however his demise has served to as soon as once more exhibit that there are individuals who nonetheless contemplate Black folks to be … with out rights and contemplate policemen to be assassins. They’re all unsuitable.”
Then there is a Twitter publish from August 2020 that mixes anti-vaccine sentiment with good ol’ usual racism:
The Chinese language vaccine, other than the necessary chip, comes with two spring rolls, a cat that strikes its hand, 2 plastic flowers, a pop-up lantern, 3 phone strains and one euro on your first managed buy.
Attacking Her Co-Star & Feigning Apologies
Gascón has even attacked her Emilia Pérez co-star Selena Gomez on this supposed tweet, which accompanied a picture of Gomez and Hailey Bieber. “She’s a wealthy rat who performs the poor b—— at any time when she will and can by no means cease bothering her ex-boyfriend [Justin Bieber] and his spouse.” Nevertheless, Gascón has said that this tweet is fraudulent, although it definitely appears to align along with her oeuvre.
In response to those racist and regretful revelations, Gascón has supplied a number of variations on an apology. When she shut down her X account, she apologized (through The Hollywood Reporter) in a method that sounded extra like martyrdom. “I’m sorry, however I can not permit this marketing campaign of hate and misinformation to have an effect on me and my household, so at their request I’m closing my account on X,” wrote the actor. “However in order for you, you’ll be able to proceed attacking me as if I have been accountable for starvation and wars on this planet… However I inform you one thing: “The extra you attempt to sink me, the stronger it’s going to make me. The higher the victory shall be.”
“Mamá, life has put me right here to ship a message of hope and love on this world, and I’m going to satisfy it,” concluded Gascón. So touching.
Gascón Is Additionally a Scapegoat
These nasty social media messages from Gascón haven’t solely been condemned by critics and the general public, but in addition Gascón’s co-stars, Audiard, and Netflix itself. The actress could also be nominated for an Oscar, however Netflix has largely eliminated her from their For Your Consideration marketing campaign, and are not paying for Gascón’s journey. Zoe Saldaña responded to the controversy by saying, “It makes me actually unhappy as a result of I do not help [it], and I haven’t got any tolerance for any detrimental rhetoric in direction of folks of any group.”
Associated
If Zoe Saldaña Was Your Favourite A part of ‘Emilia Perez,’ Watch This 2000s Gem
Lengthy earlier than ‘Emilia Perez,’ Zoe Saldaña entertained audiences with an underrated teen film stuffed with dance and drama.
Audiard was rather more frank in an interview with Deadline on Feb. 5, 2025, and introduced every part updated. “I haven’t spoken to her, and I don’t wish to. She is a self-destructive strategy that I can’t intrude in, and I actually don’t perceive why she’s persevering with,” admitted Audiard. “Why is she harming herself? Why? I don’t perceive it, and what I don’t perceive about this too is why she’s harming individuals who have been very near her.” The director added:
“I simply don’t perceive why she’s persevering with to hurt us. I’m not getting in contact along with her as a result of proper now she wants area to replicate and take accountability for her actions… She’s actually taking part in the sufferer. She’s speaking about herself as a sufferer, which is stunning. It’s as if she thought that phrases don’t damage.”
It appears as if Gascón is being thrown below the bus; although she metaphorically deserves to be, if all of the messages have been reported precisely, so does everybody who made Emilia Pérez. In a method, the controversy over her messages has been a distraction from the precise problems with the movie itself, not the private bigotry and bitterness of one among its stars. Gascón’s merciless historical past definitely displays the empty gestures of Hollywood — celebrating id politics and ignoring who the individual really is. However there’s a lot extra unsuitable with Emilia Pérez, and never simply its totally embarrassing music about vaginoplasty.
‘Emilia Pérez’ Fails Trans Individuals on Each Stage
Past its mixture of genres and stylized path, the individuals who reward Emilia Pérez typically accomplish that for its supposedly fearless depiction of a strong trans individual or for being, as one critic calls it, a “daring gender-affirmation musical.” Movie critics and audiences who’re really transgender or determine as LGBTQ+ are likely to see the film as a cis man’s deeply confused and embarrassing try and signify trans id.
In a chunk from The Pink Information titled, “As a trans girl, because of this I feel Emilia Pérez is sub-par, disingenuous, dangerous nonsense,” Amelia Hansford writes, “It’s a script that’s so alienated from the method of transitioning as a trans girl – and but blurts falsehoods out with such daring, intense conviction.” In the meantime, the Homosexual & Lesbian Alliance In opposition to Defamation (GLAAD) writes, “Emilia Pérez is a step backward for trans illustration.”
Associated
Emilia Pérez Ending, Defined: Trans Identification as an Allegory for Social Change
Jacques Audiard’s new musical crime movie Emilia Pérez stars Karla Sofía Gascón, Zoe Saldaña, and Selena Gomez. What does the ending imply?
It goes again to Audiard’s simplistic understanding of the topic. He stated in an interview for The Hollywood Reporter, “Typically within the movies I make, there’s this theme of the double life, or extra exactly, the selection of life, the price of a life. In different phrases, what number of lives does one have the correct to reside?” The director makes use of gender reassignment surgical procedure as a metaphor to enrich the story of a violent prison attempting to flee their lifetime of crime and try repentance. That is a deeply flawed technique to incorporate trans illustration into a movie; a transgender individual shouldn’t be “escaping.” As Hansford writes in The Pink Information:
“The problem with that is that transition isn’t an ethical determination, and the act of transitioning alone doesn’t one way or the other absolve you of your previous self. It isn’t a demise, neither is it a rebirth. As an alternative, Emilia continues to make use of contacts from the cartel, manipulates her household into trusting and spending time along with her, turns into bodily aggressive close to the movie’s ending when reconnecting doesn’t pan out, and even opts to threaten her spouse, performed by Selena Gomez, with monetary blackmail. None of that is framed in a method that makes any thematic sense and finally ends up showcasing Emilia as one more psychopathic trans character so as to add to the pile.”
Oh, ‘Emilia Pérez’ Insults Mexicans, Too
Emilia Pérez is a movie that not solely pretends to be about Mexican tradition, however pretends to be set there as nicely. It is filmed in France, nevertheless, by a Frenchman, and the solid is crammed with largely non-Mexicans. The accents from these actors (particularly Selena Gomez) has been picked aside and mocked by Mexicans and Spanish-speakers ever because the trailer was launched. “I undoubtedly want I had extra time [to prep],” Gomez informed Remezcla about studying Spanish for the function.
It is the solid and crew’s disdain for authenticity and Mexico itself that makes this much more egregious. “I feel this film is extra Mexican than what many Mexicans make,” Gascón informed Rolling Stone in October 2024. Within the World of Reel article “Jacques Audiard, the #1 Most Hated Man in Mexico, Sparks Extra Backlash,” it is famous how Audiard showcased his gorgeous condescension and lack of charisma with the next one-liner:
Spanish is a language of modest international locations, of creating international locations, of the poor and migrants.
In a dialog with Guillermo del Toro for The Hollywood Reporter, Audiard defined how Mexico and Mexicans did not match the imaginative and prescient he had for his Mexican movie. “I had all these photographs in my head, and these photographs weren’t going to suit on the streets of Mexico, within the interiors of Mexico. I wanted an even bigger device of stylization,” stated Audiard. “I wasn’t discovering the folks to play these roles. I noticed a number of actresses in Mexico, I met trans actresses, but it surely merely wasn’t working.” That is made all of the extra hilariously insulting when you think about the casting director and different folks behind the movie having said how “genuine” they needed the film to be.
Associated
The ten Biggest Movies Ever Made in Mexico
With a bevy of directing expertise from Alejandro Jodorowsky to Alfonso Cuarón, Mexico has deposited numerous superb movies into the pantheon.
The casting director for the movie, Carla Hool, put her foot firmly in her mouth when she mentioned the casting means of Emilia Pérez, illustrating how hypocritical the manufacturing was. “Jessi, Rita, and Emilia, they have been all Mexican characters. So we did a giant search in Mexico and within the U.S. and in Spain and all Latin America, and we needed to maintain it actually genuine,” stated Hool. “However on the finish of the day, the perfect actors who embodied these characters are those that [you see in the film]. So we had to determine the best way to modify authenticity.”
It is much more miserable to appreciate that The Academy of Movement Image Arts & Sciences has beforehand written of Hool, “With each challenge she takes on, she carries the identical essential mission: to struggle for authenticity and to open up prospects for every kind of Latinx actors.” It is exhausting to seek out the rest that so succinctly displays the misguided nature of liberal Oscar voters than this.
The Academy Awards Are likely to Reward Empty Social Justice Posturing
Talking of the Oscars. A number of astute critics have lambasted liberal Hollywood for showering Emilia Pérez with awards consideration. It is a state of affairs much like many different “social justice” movies which have garnered Oscars. There are motion pictures about racism which are comparatively empty vessels written and directed by white folks (Driving Miss Daisy and Inexperienced Ebook), and the identical factor with movies about LGBTQ+ points (Dallas Consumers Membership, The Danish Lady). There’s Slumdog Millionaire, a movie about an Indian man climbing out of poverty, written and directed by well-off white British males. There’s Crash (2004), about multiracial tensions, written and directed by white males. There’s Gandhi, concerning the Indian independence from the British Empire, directed by a white British man. And on and on.
That unlucky custom continued with Emilia Pérez and its 13 Oscar nominations. Slash Movie writes of “the well-meaning cis folks desperately attempting to show they’re not transphobic by hyping up a regressive mess,” concluding that: “It’s wildly disappointing to appreciate simply what number of Academy voters are utterly out of contact and clearly voting for the guise of performative progress of what Emilia Pérez symbolizes, moderately than let the communities represented within the movie take the lead and decide whether or not or not it is a portrayal that deserves celebration.”
Associated
What to Know In regards to the 2025 Greatest Image Oscar Nominees and The place to Stream Them
This is a breakdown of each movie nominated for Greatest Image and the place you’ll be able to watch them, together with different main Oscar nominees.
“To name this movie awards bait could be doing a disservice to awards bait – Emilia Pérez, as an alternative, is a movie that thinks it calls for respect simply by the act of current,” Hansfeld writes in The Pink Information. Writing for Vox, Kyndall Cunningham sums up the hypocrisy splendidly:
“Nonetheless, Emilia Pérez’s presence within the Oscars race isn’t precisely a shock, on condition that it falls neatly right into a class of films the white Hollywood institution likes to have fun: mawkish tales about folks on society’s margins that permit viewers to really feel socially conscious by means of their consumption, with out difficult any of the stereotypes and political messaging offered in them.”
The nice irony of that is that Gascón herself has referred to as out the Academy Awards for a similar factor (albeit in her distinctly merciless, careless, and condescending method) in a since-deleted X publish. “Increasingly the #Oscars are trying like a ceremony for unbiased and protest movies, I did not know if I used to be watching an Afro-Korean competition, a Black Lives Matter demonstration or the 8M,” Gascón wrote after the 2021 Oscars. “Other than that, an unpleasant, ugly gala.” One wonders if she’ll be attending this yr’s gala. She would possibly even win an award.