“Useless Man’s Wire” was already in manufacturing when Luigi Mangione fatally shot UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024. However you’d be forgiven for deciphering it as a response to these occasions. The movie — director Gus Van Sant’s first since “Don’t Fear, He Gained’t Get Far on Foot” in 2018 — takes place within the Nineteen Seventies, one other decade when dissent fueled by financial stagnation exploded into politically charged violence. However its sympathy for its aggrieved antihero feels very present.
“Exploded” may be taken actually right here, as Tony Kiritsis (Invoice Skarsgård) rigged his Indianapolis condominium with selfmade munitions when he took his mortgage dealer, Richard Corridor (Dacre Montgomery), hostage there for 63 frozen hours in February 1977. This was along with the gadget that offers Van Sant’s film its identify, a wire that was connected to the set off of a shotgun on one finish, and looped round Corridor’s head on the opposite. If Corridor jerked too violently, not to mention tried to run, the wire would pull the set off, firing the shotgun Kiritsis had pointed behind Corridor’s head.
Prone to spoiling well-documented (if considerably memory-holed) historic occasions, there aren’t any “Scanners”-style photographs of exploding heads in “Useless Man’s Wire.” The likelihood feels very actual within the magnificently tense opening scene, which counts down the minutes and seconds as Kiritsis takes Corridor captive at his workplace and leads him a number of blocks via downtown Indianapolis with the titular gadget round his neck. Accompanied by Danny Elfman’s jazzy rating, the sequence feels genuinely harmful, as cops and onlookers alike stand dumbfounded at Kiritsis’ brazen gambit.
The likelihood resurfaces afterward as properly, in moments the place Kiritsis’ simmering resentment — he feels he’s been cheated out of his personal private American Dream, by way of a sophisticated battle over a plot of land in rural Indiana — is delivered to a boil by police interference. On the entire, nonetheless, “Useless Man’s Wire” has bother sustaining suspense past that breathtaking opener. This weak point is partially baked into the story: 5 days is a very long time to carry your breath, and even Corridor sleeps, albeit restlessly, over that point. The remaining is a aspect impact of Van Sant’s storytelling model.
“Useless Man’s Wire” indulges in a cliché seen in lots of movies primarily based on a real story, specifically displaying footage of actual individuals alongside the actors taking part in them. We see this within the closing credit, which is comprehensible sufficient; it turns into a problem when the footage overlaps with the fictionalized occasions unfolding onscreen. That is particularly noticeable with a subplot involving Linda Web page (Myha’la), an bold younger information reporter normally sidelined to the women’ luncheon beat.
Web page and her cameraman stumble onto the Kiritsis story very early on, and refuse to present it up as soon as the higher-ups within the newsroom begin paying consideration as properly. She serves as a type of narrator, maintaining the viewers knowledgeable of latest developments inside Kiritsis’ condominium as soon as the standoff actually begins. Her stories are accompanied by precise archival information footage narrated by an older white male anchor; these don’t contradict Web page’s updates, however they do pull focus away from her and her story.
This juxtaposition could possibly be helpful for illustrating Linda’s battle to be taken significantly as a Black lady in an trade dominated by white males, however “Useless Man’s Wire” by no means fairly will get there.
References to Kiritsis being a daily at a cop bar in Indianapolis, and subsequently well-known to officers like Detective Michael Grable (Cary Elwes), is one other missed alternative. We will infer that the police are treating him in another way as a result of he’s “one in all them,” however this thread additionally will get misplaced because the variety of characters and particulars expands all through the movie.
One peripheral character with sufficient gravity to maintain the story in orbit is Fred Temple (Colman Domingo), a smooth-voiced morning radio DJ who serves as a reluctant, however sympathetic sounding board for the aggrieved kidnapper. (Kiritsis is an enormous fan, as we see in a cutaway shot to a promotional mug on his kitchen counter.) Temple retains his perspective on Kiritsis’ actions to himself; for probably the most half, he appears anxious about maintaining his spouse ready at house. It’s an everyman perspective that dovetails with Kiritsis’ personal, making Temple probably the most profitable of a number of characters Van Sant makes use of to maneuver the story ahead.
Temple is launched on the very starting of the movie via a closeup of his mouth talking right into a microphone, a nod to the DJ-narrator in Walter Hill’s “The Warriors.” Though, once more, it loses momentum because the movie’s scope widens, there’s a brusque effectivity to the visible storytelling in “Useless Man’s Wire” that calls again to ‘70s classics like “The Taking of Pelham One Two Three.” The enhancing specifically has a pleasingly punchy no-bullshit really feel about it, utilizing juxtaposition to make its factors cleanly and clearly.
There’s a touch of tongue-in-cheek irony in the best way Van Sant nods to his ‘70s influences, in addition to within the needle drops which can be scattered all through the movie. (Kiritsis’ burn-it-down radio rants are paired with “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised,” for instance.) The place Van Sant will get critical is within the movie’s incendiary closing stretch, which appears to agree with most of the characters that Kiritsis is a people hero.
The movie’s solely actual villain is Al Pacino, doing a Colonel Sanders accent as Richard’s father M.L. Corridor, whose pitiless rigidity stands in for capitalism as a complete. The elder Corridor’s indifference towards his son’s life shocks even his captor, prompting a bonding second that softens the viewer’s perceptions of each males. These scenes, which occur in Kiritsis’ condominium halfway via the siege, briefly pull “Useless Man’s Wire” again into focus, clarifying its thesis about how the large guys prosper whereas the little guys get screwed.
One doesn’t rent Invoice Skarsgård until one is in search of a lanky, off-putting weirdo. However Skarsgård does a superb job of creating his character’s frustration and rising panic grounded and relatable. This helps immensely once we get to the finale, which complicates the us-vs-them narrative. Finally, “Useless Man’s Wire” concedes that Kiritsis’ violent actions had extra detrimental results than constructive ones. However the man nonetheless had a degree.
Grade: B-
“Useless Man’s Wire” premiered on the 2025 Venice Movie Competition. It’s presently in search of U.S. distribution.
Need to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie opinions and demanding ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Evaluation by David Ehrlich, through which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the most effective new opinions and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.