This previous yr has seen a flurry of legal-related developments for ex-reality TV star Julie Chrisley. In 2022, she and her husband, Todd, have been discovered responsible of financial institution fraud and extra, and Julie was later ordered to serve seven years in jail. Mrs. Chrisley’s sentence was overturned earlier this yr, with a resentencing listening to scheduled shortly after. In the end, a choose dominated that the unique sentence ought to be reinstated, resulting in Julie interesting the transfer and, as she continues to try this, she didn’t maintain again whereas discussing that very same choose.
Julie Chrisley’s feedback on the choose have been made recognized through a submitting that was made public on the finish of this previous week. Per the paperwork, which have been shared with WSB-TV 2, the 51-year-old mom of three and her authorized workforce argued that the ruling in her resentencing was “vindictive.” Apart from alleging that the choice was unfair, the previous Chrisley Is aware of Greatest star and co. additionally chastised the courtroom for an additional purported side of the listening to that they took situation with:
The listening to and sentence can solely go away on impression to any affordable observer: the sentence was vindictive. As a substitute, the courtroom spent extra time admonishing Mrs. Chrisley’s daughter, who was within the courtroom, for public statements she made vital of the case, which the courtroom discovered about off the report. Mrs. Chrisely acquired a vindictive and unfair sentence from a choose personally biased in opposition to her and her household.
Julie Chrisley’s sentence was overturned in June as the results of her and her husband’s enchantment. It was reasoned by a three-judge panel that there was no ample proof to indicate that Julie participated within the finance-based offenses dedicated by her partner and their accountant, Peter Tarantino. The rescheduling listening to was finally scheduled for September and, forward of that, it was stated that prosecutors requested that Mrs. Chrisley serve her unique seven-year sentence.
Julie Chrisley’s sentence was overturned in June as the results of her and her husband’s enchantment. It was reasoned by a three-judge panel that there was no ample proof to indicate that Julie participated within the finance-based offenses dedicated by her partner and their accountant, Peter Tarantino. The rescheduling listening to was finally scheduled for September and, forward of that, it was stated that prosecutors requested that Mrs. Chrisley serve her unique seven-year sentence.
After the choose dominated in favor of the aforementioned jail stint, one of many Chrisley matriarch’s legal professionals, Jay Surgent, spoke out. He defined that he, his consumer and colleagues have been “saddened by this choice” and referred to as it each “unreasonable” and “harsh.” He additionally argued that Chrisley’s resentencing was impacted by her “notoriety” as a media persona. Previously, each Julie and Todd Chrisley have argued that the authorized system has sought to make examples of them as a result of they’re celebrities.
Jay Surgent revealed that an enchantment can be filed, and that exact authorized transfer from Julie Chrisley was set in movement in October. On the time, it was reported that the submitting was transient and easily laid out the authorized workforce’s arguments for an enchantment. These authorized paperwork have been reportedly filed with the eleventh Circuit Courtroom of Appeals.
Relating to Todd Chrisley’s emotions on his spouse’s resentencing, his beforehand talked about lawyer stated that he was “dissatisfied” and “dissatisfied” by how the listening to panned out. Not solely that, however he alleged that Todd was additionally “involved about Julie’s well being and welfare.” As for Todd’s well-being, he’s serving 10 years (decreased from 12) at Pensacola, Florida’s Federal Jail Camp, which is closing down. In the meantime, Julie has been serving her sentence at Federal Medical Middle in Lexington, Kentucky.
As of this writing, there’s been no formal response to Julie Chrisley’s latest feedback concerning the choose presiding over her sentencing. Time will inform how this example will progress and whether or not Chrisley’s enchantment will work in her favor.