Steven Soderbergh’s cooly romantic “Black Bag” may current itself as a chatty little thriller within the vein of John le Carré, however this slinky film’s semi-compelling spycraft is sort of totally within the service of testing the wedding between two of Britain’s most elite safety operatives — of asking simply how a lot full transparency actually issues between two individuals who have at all times been trustworthy to one another the place it counts. Each couple has its secrets and techniques, however at what level does love threaten to turn into a canopy story for every accomplice’s personal non-public missions?
It’s usually stated that each sturdy relationship relies on a basis of belief, however belief isn’t essentially the identical factor as reality. Quite the opposite, belief could be the sum of one million completely different falsehoods, omissions, and selectively instructed tales — belief is understanding that somebody will solely conceal one thing from you as a result of the intel they maintain to themselves helps to help the loyalty you share collectively. Marriage is a promise that you just’ll at all times select to be sincere together with your accomplice, not a promise that you just’ll by no means need to mislead them. In fact, the character of that dynamic can lend itself to all method of misuse, which is why most {couples} would by no means admit to one another that it applies to them.
George Woodhouse (Michael Fassbender) and his beloved spouse Kathryn St. Jean (Cate Blanchett) don’t have that drawback. Each employed as elite operatives for Britain’s Nationwide Cyber Safety Centre, they share a singular appreciation for the truth that some issues have to stay secret so as to maintain one another protected, and the belief required of that association — and maybe the belief created from it — has made their relationship the envy of each spy in London. It doesn’t harm that they each appear like film stars, however George and Kathryn are much less begrudged for his or her class than they’re for his or her capability to take care of a palpable heat between them regardless of belonging to an establishment that tends to breed a sure coldness. Is that establishment marriage or British Intelligence? Sure.
Each are shaken to their cores by the tip of the film’s snaking first shot, which follows George via the bowels of a London restaurant as he makes his approach to a clandestine assembly with a fellow agent within the alley out again. Slightly skullduggery comes with the territory, in fact, however Soderbergh’s camerawork tacitly suggests this isn’t one other day within the workplace — for a filmmaker who’s turn into so fetishistically dedicated to unfussiness (even in a high-concept train like “Presence”), such an elaborate introduction seems like a conspicuous deviation from the norm. That suspicion is borne out by what George is about to be instructed: “There’s a stranger in our home.”
The foundations of the sport are easy. George is handed a listing with the names of 5 colleagues on it, and his job is to determine which considered one of them is a traitor. The one complication? A kind of names is Kathryn St. Jean. This clearly received’t be the primary time that George has needed to maintain one thing confidential from his spouse, however it will be the primary time that he’s been ordered to eye her with suspicion, and a lot of the hyper-contained intrigue that David Koepp’s script develops from there may be created from the interior friction of a person who’s pressured to search for causes to mistrust the one particular person on Earth he’s by no means doubted earlier than.
Our worry is that he’ll discover one. In spite of everything, George is thought across the workplace for being a human lie-detector take a look at, and Fassbender — veering even nearer in direction of android territory than he did in David Fincher’s “The Killer” — performs the steel-nerved spy with a clenched elan that solely threatens to come back free when he begins to lose his personal grip on the reality. Unflappable calm isn’t simply his skilled demeanor, it’s additionally his private love language.
George has at all times identified the way to set a transparent boundary between enterprise and pleasure (clear, however porous), and his plan to root out the rat hinges on the conviction that his colleagues aren’t so able to drawing that line for themselves. He’s all too proper about that. All George has to do is invite the 4 suspects over to his and Kathryn’s eye-watering townhouse for an intimate ceremonial dinner and ask them a single query — the fireworks instantly begin popping off from there, they usually received’t fizzle out till somebody on the desk has a brand new gap of their head.
“Black Bag” isn’t overly involved with the remainder of George and Kathryn’s fellow spies, however the movie would by no means have been capable of justify the seductive groove of David Holmes’ rating or survive the sterility of Soderbergh’s path — a sterility this story is ready to weaponize to its benefit extra successfully than something he’s made since “Aspect Results” — with out the lifeforce the supporting forged brings with them.
That’s very true of the nice Tom Burke, whose loutish Freddie Smalls is equal elements Richard Burton and Orson Welles; Freddie is an incorrigible lush who’s solely gotten this far on the energy of his allure, and it’s all too simple to grasp why George simply handed him up for a promotion. Fortunate for Freddie, he can talk about the newfound resentment he feels in direction of his boss with NCSC psychotherapist Dr. Zoe Vaughan (a sometimes commanding Naomie Harris), who paradoxically is aware of far an excessive amount of about the remainder of her workforce for anybody to belief her with their final remaining secrets and techniques.
That’s one thing Colonel James Stokes — her affected person and aspect piece — needs to be particularly cautious about (he’s performed by Regé-Jean Web page, perversely well-cast as probably the most aloof character in a film that appears designed to show his 007 bonafides). Clarissa (“Business” breakout Marisa Abela) is on the opposite finish of the spectrum because the youngest and most wide-eyed member of the workforce, a wise lady who’s simply beginning to wrap her head across the messiness that comes with being a spy. In a crackerjack film that just about totally consists of scenes the place folks discuss round one another in confined areas, few moments show extra flamable than the late-night go to the place Clarissa is made to understand that she has no thought what George may need from her.
That dreaded uncertainty — or the dearth thereof — is the very factor that George treasures most about his marriage, and the factor he turns into most decided to root out of the “home.” Discovering the traitor is only a means to an finish. And whereas Koepp’s script is powered by a twisty and considerably unrewarding plot a few stolen polymer with nuclear implications (enter: Pierce Brosnan because the unsmiling boss accountable for the restoration operation), “Black Bag” could possibly be totally understood simply by following the arc of George’s emergent wariness. Is an errant ticket stub within the bed room waste bin actually sufficient to problem all the things he thought he knew about his spouse? It appears absurd, however even probably the most excellent spies are solely human on the finish of the day.
To that finish, it appears deliberate that Kathryn is basically stored within the background, as if Soderbergh had been utilizing the sheer enormity of Blanchett’s shadow to maintain her character prime of thoughts at the same time as she stays an impenetrable cypher (among the scenes the place Kathryn is available in from the chilly make it really feel just like the film is having its cake and consuming it too, exhausting as it’s to complain concerning the probability to look at Cate Blanchett and Naomie Harris attempt to out-freeze one another). She and George are seldom on display screen collectively, and Kathryn’s interiority by no means extends a lot deeper than her potential motive to betray him, however that seems like the proper alternative for a movie about somebody who’s beginning to develop very uncomfortable with the double-blind nature of his marriage.
If “Black Bag” denies us the sort of duplicitous confrontations that different variations of this story may take pains to savor, Soderbergh’s aversion to giving audiences what they need — and the extreme angularity that he tends to supply us now as a substitute — is sort of as rewarding right here because it was totally indefensible in “Magic Mike’s Final Dance.” Like “Let Them All Discuss” earlier than it (and in addition, maybe much more curiously, Fincher’s “The Killer” as effectively), it is a film a few management freak who’s pressured to improvise when the principles they’ve at all times lived by are instantly challenged from inside, and at the least half the enjoyable of it’s watching George attempt to persuade himself that he was proper to do issues a sure method; that trusting his spouse to share info on her personal phrases created the inspiration for a relationship that was deeper, more true, and sexier than one spent feverishly digging up one another’s secrets and techniques.
“When you may lie about all the things,” somebody asks, “how do you inform the reality about something?” If the reply that “Black Bag” affords to that query isn’t a lot of a shock, the movie arrives at it with the form of incandescent confidence that makes it simple to just accept at face worth. Marriage, like spycraft, is a technique of figuring out what must be swept underneath the rug, and what must be uncovered for the world to see. George and Kathryn are very, excellent at that. What they know, and what the film round them makes deliciously clear, is that lies can assume an ecstatic reality of their very own as long as the individuals who share them consider in one another.
Grade: B
Focus Options will launch “Black Bag” in theaters on Friday, March 14.
Wish to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and significant ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched publication, In Assessment by David Ehrlich, wherein our Chief Movie Critic and Head Critiques Editor rounds up the most effective new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely out there to subscribers.