‘Labyrinth’ Followers Share Conflicted Views After Newest Replace on Lengthy-Delayed Sequel

Labyrinth is certainly one of Jim Henson’s biggest achievements, even when the Muppet creator himself by no means actually bought to see simply how beloved the film would change into after its preliminary flop launch. Starring David Bowie and a bunch of colourful and memorable puppet creations, Labyrinth is the very definition of a cult traditional, and has earned a place as a film with a strong place in popular culture. Which means, there are lots of individuals who, regardless of loving the thought of seeing the story proceed, don’t need to see the unique movie’s legacy ruined.

After it was revealed on Thursday that The Northman director appears to be including the long-in-development Labyrinth sequel to his lately introduced werewolf film, followers wasted little time in sharing their deeply conflicted views on social media. X/Twiiter consumer @NomiMalones summed up the final feeling with a submit that learn, “(As a lot as a I like Eggers) Labyrinth doesn’t want a sequel. Go away it alone! The unique is so charming and ideal as sequel simply wouldn’t work as of late (or ever).”

Does ‘Labyrinth’ Want a Sequel?

As is usually the case, there are a number of arguments to be made out of either side. The thought of a sequel to Labyrinth is definitely extra interesting than the considered somebody trying to remake the unique film – an act that might in all probability be seen as treason of some variety – however one of many massive hindrances is how the film would work with out certainly one of its important characters – David Bowie’s Goblin King Jareth.

Bowie handed away in 2020, forsaking not solely an unbelievable musical legacy, however a number of iconic film and TV performances as properly. Amongst these, Labyrinth was maybe the one which on the time of the film’s launch appeared to be destined to be forgotten, however as an alternative grew to become one of the enduring. For that purpose, the thought of trying to recast the function in a sequel is one which many followers simply can not settle for. As @shockazulu_1 mentioned of their X submit, “There is no such thing as a Labyrinth with out Bowie.”

In a lengthier enlargement of that remark, @FollowingM42309 shared a comparability that has change into the dilemma for a lot of followers of Henson’s film in mild of Eggers seemingly confirmed involvement. They mentioned:

“I like Eggers. However you may’t do a sequel to Labyrinth with out David Bowie anymore than you are able to do one other Beetlejuice with out Michael Keaton. Bowie WAS That film. You’d really feel his absence in the event that they made a sequel, it could by no means be capable of reside as much as the legend that was Bowie.”

Associated

Jennifer Connelly Shares View on Labyrinth’s Reputation: ‘We Do not Make Motion pictures Like That Anymore’

The success of 1986 film Labyrinth didn’t occur in a single day, however star Jennifer Connelly is aware of why it’s so beloved right this moment.

In fact, the Labyrinth sequel might negate the issue of Bowie’s Goblin King by delivering a sequel set in the identical world that Jennifer Connelly’s Sarah was thrown into when she spirited away her child brother, however one which explores different corridors of the Labyrinth, ones that don’t result in the Goblin Metropolis. With Eggers, there may be each chance that he would need to create his personal story throughout the Labyrinth that doesn’t depend on what got here earlier than it, and that might properly be one of the simplest ways for the brand new film to go. With the Jim Henson Firm as soon as once more set to fill that world with extra puppet creations, the tip end result might be a type of uncommon events when a film’s improvement hell has all simply been the universe’s means of ready for the best individual to get the job.

See also  ‘La Cage aux Folles’ assessment: A heartfelt tribute to the roots of drag

Labyrinth

Launch Date

June 27, 1986

Runtime

101 minutes

Stream