Survivor 47 winner Rachel LaMont simply pulled off some of the dominating victories within the historical past of the present. Aside from one notable episode the place she was blindsided by an all-time transfer and certainly one of her allies went residence, she dominated almost all of the post-merge episodes. She received 4 Immunity Challenges, constructed implausible social relationships with just about everybody on the seaside, and performed some benefits in spectacular style. She was the clear winner heading into the finale and throughout the finale, however to the shock of many followers, she was not the unanimous winner. Kyle Ostwald voted for Sam, and now we all know why.
The affable problem beast recorded a video explaining why he wrote down Sam’s identify as an alternative of Rachel’s, and it seems, it’s not as a result of he thinks he performed a greater recreation. In reality, Kyle overtly admits Rachel deserved to win the season. As an alternative, he voted for Sam as a result of he knew everybody else was voting for Rachel, and he felt like somebody wanted to step up and ensure Sam bought second place as an alternative of Sue. Right here’s a portion of his quote…
There are some Survivor followers on social media who are usually not pleased campers, and so they’re pointing to this quote as proof of how a lot Rachel bought screwed out of being a unanimous winner. I hear that. I like Rachel. I might have liked to see her honored with each single vote, however I’m additionally right here for Kyle’s honesty and am not essentially towards what he did.
Initially, being a unanimous winner on Survivor doesn’t matter. Boston Rob Mariano completely dominated Redemption Island, to the purpose the place folks nonetheless complain about how one-sided the season was, and he didn’t even win a unanimous victory. Rachel isn’t any lower than as a result of she didn’t get one of many votes, and he or she wouldn’t have been one way or the other higher if she bought all of the votes. The purpose of the sport is to win and he or she received.
Second of all, Kyle’s vote is a good instance of how each jury member treats Remaining Tribal Council otherwise. We’ve switched into an period the place lots of people vote based mostly on who they assume had essentially the most strategic recreation, however there is no such thing as a rule saying that’s how you could vote. Some folks clearly use the FTC to settle grudges or work out their anger, and generally these votes sway the precise finish end result and who will get what payouts. That’s a part of the sport and at all times has been.
And eventually, I agree with Kyle that Sam deserved second place. Sue must be very pleased with herself in making it to the finale at nearly 60. She performed a strong and constant recreation. She aligned with the suitable gamers, and constructed sufficient alliances to navigate her manner by way of. Good for her. However Sam was a way more energetic participant within the recreation. He was part of some big strikes, reinvented himself a number of occasions and performed loads more durable. He additionally had a implausible efficiency in fire-making and Remaining Tribal Council, and I’m glad he completed second.
Finally, Rachel will for certain go down as a terrific winner and positively one of many higher gamers of the so-called New Period. She’s wonderful at each side of the sport, and I’d like to see her play once more to really solidify her place amongst the all-time greats. Whether or not she does or not, nevertheless, her legacy is safe, even when she did not get Kyle’s vote.