This can be a movie about Russia, set in Russia, and made by a filmmaker educated there, but it was produced by France, Germany, the Netherlands, Latvia, Romania, and Lithuania. And that’s very obvious with the mass of manufacturing vainness plates previous to a gap shot (certainly, these worldwide co-production strategies are how worthy movies are sometimes made).
“Two Prosecutors”’ director Sergei Loznitsa claims Ukraine because the closest component of his post-Soviet heritage, and resides in Berlin, however he has all of the attributes of a dissident filmmaker, criticizing and scrutinizing one thing he intimately is aware of. It will be good to see Russian-produced movies made below a tradition of free expression, however our relative compensation are programmes and movies with English dialogue like “Chernobyl” and “Physician Zhivago”, quite a few unhealthy ones with worse accents, and in addition “Two Prosecutors”, shot in Latvia, however genuine as something.
Loznitsa made arguably his finest movie up to now with the astonishingly prescient “Donbass” in 2018; the pandemic and his extraordinary jones for amassing uncommon archive in his docs saved him away from fiction filmmaking since. A mass e-book pulping of nice Russian authors in his current tense Ukraine-Russia warfare examine “The Invasion”, which was at Cannes final yr, supplies a seed for his competitors entry “Two Prosecutors”, tailored from the little-known Russian writer Georgy Demidov, whose novella of the identical identify particulars his experiences of incarceration throughout Stalin’s 1937 Nice Terror, was written a number of many years after in 1969, and solely noticed publication in 2009 after his manuscripts have been seized in 1980 by the KGB.
The titular “two prosecutors” signify within the mildly absurdist sense of “The Two Popes” or “The Two Jakes”: the principle protagonist, the newly employed, younger municipal lawyer Kornyev (Aleksandr Kuznetsov), goes tête-à-tête with a number of double or doppelgänger figures, principally his former legislation college professor Stepniak (Aleksandr Filippenko), a member of the Bolshevik revolutionary technology now dubiously imprisoned himself.
Virtually a tonal “consumption of breath”, the movie’s transfixing prologue proceeds largely sans dialogue, or quite the mumbling and muttering dialogue there may be nestles in a satisfying void of silence. Initially set at a forbidding, suitably labyrinthine jail in Bryansk, an aged convict is given the mind-numbing however time-passing activity of destroying prisoners’ letters interesting to Stalin himself for his or her defective punishments, when he finds a message actually written in blood by Stepniak addressed as an alternative to the native district prosecutor (maybe not pondering he’ll be greeted by the inexperienced, baby-faced Kornyev).
Kornyev is the archetypal, idealistic new recruit heading for a world of ache, and Loznitsa’s adaptation sends him on a prosecutor’s “progress” (a “bureaucratic procedural” may also be the movie’s style tag), to succeed in Stepniak. Referencing Kafka is low-hanging literary fruit, however the obstacles confronted are surreally impenetrable. First, he has to seek out out which specific cursed and ratty a part of the jail his new shopper is in; state his enterprise and authorize his identification, and have that ratified by a superior, for whom he’ll wait a number of hours to see (he even takes a nap, and nobody cares); be warned by the specter of venereal illness an infection; need to endure the whole thing of this once more, at half-speed, and so forth, and so forth. The effectiveness and delicate suspense of Loznita’s visuals are matched by the chamber-piece depth of the characters’ verbal face-offs, dense with specialist jargon and gallows humor, and never giving a rattling if you happen to can’t sustain.
Shock, shock: Stepniak is incarcerated for no outlined purpose, and he’s confronted extreme bodily punishment, with Loznitsa disturbing us by unveiling — however by no means sadistically gloating in — the damaged ribs and discoloring bruises on his torso. With Orwell’s “1984” in fact largely impressed by Soviet totalitarianism, he actually has been put away for a “thoughtcrime”; merely being of an period the place Trotsky flourished on the high of the get together makes him a watched man. Or a share of a fraction of a threat — higher lock him up, than threat a speck of backlash.
Additional, supplementary prosecutors are in retailer for Kornyev’s Moscow assembly schedule, with Stepniak suggesting he seek the advice of authorized officers on the Social gathering’s summit. Assembly the steely-eyed common prosecutor Vyshynsky (Anatoli Beliy), Kornyev has soiled methods and accusations of his personal to make use of strategically — for instance, that the native department of the infamous NKVD (the inside ministry and secret police eternally related to the Purge years) have been infiltrated. Doublethink inside doublethink isn’t an terrible concept to undermine this self-perpetuating realm of energy, but the younger lawyer must look over his shoulder…
Loznitsa’s movies are all the time informational and exact, and if some viewers may discover the dialogue-driven strategy clotted and impenetrable, it definitely creates an aura the place you marvel how the movie may confide in these much more knowledgeable or with dwelling reminiscence of the Soviet Union. And with Loznitsa’s Western European credentials and business acclaim, it does flatter what audiences from that area in all probability want to have confirmed for them about life within the Japanese bloc. In the end, “Two Prosecutors”’ is sort of a excellent 50-50 cocktail of dread and dialogue, the vodka being whichever you’d select, making the inevitable really feel able to deferment, earlier than it strikes extra devastatingly than you’d even assume.
Grade: B+
“Two Prosecutors” premiered in competitors on the 2025 Cannes Movie Competition. It’s at the moment looking for U.S. distribution.
Need to keep updated on IndieWire’s movie critiques and significant ideas? Subscribe right here to our newly launched e-newsletter, In Evaluate by David Ehrlich, during which our Chief Movie Critic and Head Evaluations Editor rounds up the very best new critiques and streaming picks together with some unique musings — all solely accessible to subscribers.