Attorneys for Justin Baldoni have made a critical declare in a latest court docket submitting, alleging that Blake Vigorous tried to strain her buddy Taylor Swift into supporting her publicly within the It Ends With Us authorized case. In keeping with Baldoni’s authorized staff, Vigorous allegedly informed Swift to delete textual content messages and threatened to leak private conversations if Swift didn’t subject a press release backing her.
In a letter filed on Wednesday, Could 14, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, said why his staff believes a subpoena issued to Venable, the regulation agency representing Swift, is vital to the case.
“The Vigorous Defendants’ insistence that the subpoena seeks irrelevant data is flawed,” Freedman wrote. He claimed the staff acquired data from a supply extremely prone to have dependable data that Vigorous requested Swift to delete textual content messages.
The letter additionally alleges that Vigorous’s lawyer contacted Swift’s authorized staff and “demanded that Ms. Swift launch a press release of help for Ms. Vigorous,” including that if Swift refused, personal textual content messages could possibly be leaked. Freedman stated they have been knowledgeable Swift’s lawyer responded and “addressed these inappropriate and apparently extortionate threats.”
Blake Vigorous’s lawyer, Mike Gottlieb, issued a agency denial, calling the claims ‘categorically false.’ “We unequivocally deny all of those so-called allegations, that are cowardly sourced to supposed nameless sources and fully untethered from actuality,” stated Gottlieb in a press release to PEOPLE.
“That is what we have now come to count on from the Wayfarer events’ attorneys…who seem to like nothing greater than capturing first, with none proof.” Gottlieb additionally talked about that they plan to file motions in opposition to Baldoni’s authorized staff, saying they may instantly file motions with the court docket to carry these attorneys accountable for his or her misconduct.
Taylor Swift was subpoenaed on Could 9 as a part of the continuing lawsuit. Nevertheless, her staff says she had no position within the film’s manufacturing.
Taylor Swift’s spokesperson stated that she was by no means current on the set of the film, didn’t contribute to the movie’s rating, and by no means seen or edited any model of it. The spokesperson said that Swift’s solely involvement was the licensing of her music My Tears Ricochet. Additionally they claimed that the subpoena was an try to make use of Swift’s identify to draw public consideration and generate tabloid curiosity.
ALSO READ: Taylor Swift Appears to be like to Deepen Bond With THIS Gray’s Anatomy Star Amid Distance From Blake Vigorous: ‘She Desires Her in Her World’